Showing posts with label Coaching. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coaching. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

(PYQ 2020 Mock Answer: Public administration) - Mughal Administration

Q. Mughal administration incorporated a combination of Indian and extra-Indian elements. Discuss 


Answer : 


After the success of Babur in the first battle of Panipat in 1526, the Mughal rule was established in India. The Mughal empire was one of the prosperous empires at the point of time and was very well known for the sound administration system. 

The Indian elements in Mughal administration are as follows:

  1. Monarchial form of government: Kautilya in his work Arthashastra mentions that the Monarchial system is the preferable form of government. In the Mughal administration as well the administration is entered around the king. 
  2. Federal form of Government: Given the size and diversity of India, all major empires like the Mauryans and Guptas preferred dividing the kingdom into many provinces for ease of administration. 
  3. Tradition authority of the headmen at the village level. 
  4. Land revenue/tax: Since, agriculture was the main occupation at that point of time, the Mughals like their preceding kingdoms relied heavily on the land revenues. 
  5. Military nature of administration : The heads of the provinces and districts had civilian as well military roles
  6. Spoils system in filling top level positions. 


Extra-Indian elements are as follows: 

  1. Mansabdari system and jagirdari system had been influenced by the Iqtadari system, which in turn was not indigenous to India. 
  2. The religious powers of the sultan, by the infallibility decree issued by Akbar, the king became the ultimate interpreter of Quran. No other previous king in India exercised such religious powers
  3. Paper administration (Khagaj Raj) in india was introduced by the Mughals.


Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription


Thursday, October 15, 2020

(PYQ Mock Answer: Public administration) Chester Bernard

 "Executive positions imply a complex morality and require a high capacity of responsibility" — (Chester Barnard). Comment. (15 Marks)


Answer:


Chester Bernard says there are two kinds of people in an organisation: one’s who are unwilling to take responsibility while the others are those who are willing take responsibility for their own actions as well as for the action of the subordinates. If a person is holding an executive position then clearly he/she belong to the latter category, hence indicating a high capacity of responsibility. 

Chester Bernard gave theory of functional leadership wherein a leader has to perform 3 functions :-
1.
Establishing and maintaining the system of communication in the org.
2. Securing essential efforts and services from subordinates by motivating them to exert themselves for the org.’s purpose.
3. Formulating and defining purposes and objectives.

As a leader, the executive is expected to take the responsibility to perform the above three functions. This further substantiate the fact that executive positions require a high capacity of responsibility.


Chester Bernard also defines leadership as moral responsibility. Which means a person holding leadership position must avoid the tendency to misuse the resources of the organisation for private purposes. Hence,  we can conclude that Executive positions imply a complex morality.





Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription

Wednesday, October 14, 2020

(PYQ Mock Answer: Public administration) NPM/Neo-Taylorism

 New Public Management has been branded by certain scholars as `Neo-Taylorism'. Is it a justified comparison? What factors have led to the decline of NPM so soon after its birth? (20 Marks)


New Public Management as a concept emerged to deal with the issues of economy and efficiency in Public Sector Enterprises. The government had to give huge amount of budgetary support to these PSEs and the losses incurred by PSUs resulted in high amounts of fiscal deficit for the government. Hence to promote economy and efficiency in the PSEs, the government decided to adopt the principles followed in private organisations for the PSEs as well. Since Private organisations were mostly following Scientific Management Theory or Taylorism, the government ended up adopting the same for PSEs. The following are the features of NPM, that justify why it can be called Neo-taylorism:

1. Emphasises on implementing scientific management principles to improve performance of PSEs 

2. Emphasises on cost-cutting – economy 

3. Providing responsive services to citizens 


4. Use of information Technology 

5. Emphasises on implementing scientific management principles to improve performance of PSEs 


6. NPM treat citizens as customers and the government considers itself a service provider so that the moral responsibility of bureaucracy is transformed into legal accountability 

7. Developing competition and ensuring performance control 


   

The reason for the decline of NPM so soon after its birth are as follows: 

1. NPM is based on market philosophy wherein market takes into consideration the needs of only those people who can pay for services whereas the needs of those who can't pay are ignored 

2. Government is not there to maximise profits, objective of government is to maximise the welfare of people. It's the responsibility of the government to provide basic needs to people irrespective of the costs involved in it. Even if loss is incurred in the process, Government has to provide those services. 

3. Critics said that NPM might be applicable for developing countries where in citizens can be treated as customers as they can pay for the services. Government can consider itself as service provider like other private sector providers. But applicability of NPM is restricted in developing countries because in developing countries people can't pay for services 




Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription

Monday, September 14, 2020

(PYQ Mock Answer: Public administration) Woodrow Wilson

Q"Even after 130 years of its publication, Woodrow Wilson's essay 'The Study of Administration' continues to have great relevance even today." Comment. (10 Marks)


Answer:


The essay 'The Study of Administration’ is the reason for the emergence of new discipline of public administration. The following concepts dealt in the essay has great relevance even today 

  1. “Politics-Administration dichotomy” rightly brings the dilemma at hand today “How to ensure that the politicians and bureaucrats work in coordination but at the same time how we can avoid politicisation of bureaucracy or bureaucratisation of polity.   
  2. The bureaucracies across the world are known for their inefficiency, the essay rightly addresses the need to replicate the economy and efficiency of business into administration.  
  3. Comparative approach: with the emergence of Comparative public administration the need is now felt to not to study an administrative system in isolation. This comparative approach ofWilson has been the torch bearer for the field of CPA.
  4. Overburdened bureaucrats nowadays prefer more and more to sit in the comforts of their office and hence get disconnected from the people. Wilson’s suggestion to take into consideration the opinions of the public holds relevance in this regard today to overcome this disconnect.


Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription

Friday, August 7, 2020

()(PYQ Mock Answer: Public administration) Theories of Leadership

Q.  "Leaders do the right things; managers do them rightly" — (Warren Bennis). Is this distinction by him valid? Explain. (10 Marks)


Answer: 


The concept can be understood through a simple story. There once was a king, he wanted the people to not feel the burden of taxation, hence for the taxes that people paid to the king, people were given wheat. The people never appreciated the king and blamed him for taxing them. The king falls ill and asks his Son (the Prince)to make people appreciate the kings efforts to reduce their burden of taxation. The Prince immediately announces that in lieu of the taxation, instead of wheat only husk would be given, the people suddenly started to appreciate the king. 

The moral of the story is that even though the prince wanted to do the right thing, he did not do it rightly. In the government, the political leaders determine what is right for the people , but the bureaucrats oversee the implementation in the right manner. Hence this distinction drawn between leaders and managers is right. 



Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription

Sunday, August 2, 2020

(PYQ GS paper II Mock Answer: Polity governance) - Citizens Charter

Q. The Citizen’s Charter is an ideal instrument of organisational transparency and accountability, but it has its own limitations. Identify the limitations and suggest measures for greater effectiveness of the Citizen’s Charters. (15 Marks)

Answer:

A Citizens’ Charter is basically a set of commitments made by an organization regarding the standards of service which it delivers. The Citizens’ Charter is an instrument which seeks to make an organization transparent, accountable and citizen friendly.

Limitations of Citizens Charter: 

  • The term Citizen’s Charter has become a misnomer because in every govt dept it is prepared by bureaucracy without involving stakeholders. 
  • Since it’s a voluntary commitment to implement Citizen’s Charter, these are never taken seriously.
  • Absence of awareness among citizens esp. in rural areas about Citizen’s Charter.
  • Citizen’s Charter doesn’t define services & standards in an objective & quantifiable term so that performance can be evaluated. As described by 2nd ARC, Citizen’s Charter are nothing but “pious Statements with noble intentions having no practical significance”.
  • Performance of bureaucracy in implementation of Citizen’s Charter has no impact on their career advancement. There is no motivation for bureaucracy to implement it.
  • Most of the Citizen’s Charters are in English language which becomes difficult for people from rural areas to understand it.
  • Recommendations of Social Audit Committees which help in preparing Citizen’s Charters are only advisory in nature & not taken seriously.
  • High levels of corruption in implementation as there is no accountability & improper grievance redressal mechanism.
  • Colonial attitude of bureaucracy due to which it has failed to understand the importance of Citizen’s Charter in empowering of citizens.

Measures needed to improve effectiveness of citizens charter:
  • Making consultation with citizens mandatory while framing citizens charter. 
  • Real time updation of info on the govt websites especially regarding allocation of finances.
  • Citizen’s Charter can be formulated in vernacular languages.
  • Citizen’s Charter should clearly specify outlays, time & output.
  • Quality of services should be defined in objective terms. These should be defined on the basis of global standards. 
  • Civil Services Code be amended to include effective implementation of Citizen’s Charter as one of the parameters upon which their career advancement would depend.
  • Proper accountability & Grievance Redressal Mechanism.
  • Citizen’s Charter should come under purview of Lokpal.
  • Proper implementation of Whistleblowers (Protection) Act.
  • Citizen’s Charter should be further expanded into People’s Charter or Precariat Charter.

Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription


Saturday, August 1, 2020

(PYQ Mock Answer Polity Governance/Public Administration) Role of Media


Q. When the media is controlled by vested interests, how can it control the vested interests in the government ? How can the media become more responsible & impartial ? (2017)

Answer:

In a democracy the media plays a very important role in bridging the gap between the Citizens and the State. The recent issues of Politicisation of media, Paid news, Yellow journalism, Sensationalisation and scandal obsessed media has raised serious questions on the credibility of the media. A media controlled by vested interests has transformed the media from a watchdog into a lapdog of the powerful sections of the society. To make the media responsible and impartial, following measure can be undertaken:
  1. Self regulation: A government regulator will be a hindrance for the independence of media and raises threat of censorship, hence a powerful and responsible self regulatory body of media is the need of the hour.
  2. The press council of India, can be strengthened with more powers to punish the violators.
  3. There must be restriction on the aggregate holdings and cross holdings of politicians and businessmen in Media houses.
  4. A code of conduct and code of ethics can be prescribed for the members of the media and strict action can be taken by the self regulator in case of violations.
  5. Crowdfunding for Media houses to reduce undue influence of any particular section of the society and to enforce the media loyalty to the public at large.

The above measures can go a long way in establishing a vibrant media that can promote accountability and transparency in the administration and further the empowerment of Citizens. 


Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription

(PYQ Mock Answer Polity Governance/Public Administration) 73rd Ammendment

Q. The 73rd amendment may accentuate fiscal indiscipline by establishing between states & local government a system of transfers, similar to the one in place between central & state govt. (World Bank) Comment. (2013)


Answer:

Given the asymmetry in powers in collection of taxes between the centre and the states, the constitution establishes the Finance Commission (A.280) to ensure devolution of financial resources to the states. This transfer of revenues from the centre to the state has resulted in fiscal profligacy among the state governments, the following points substantiate the same:
  1. Aid curse: This “free” transfer of resources from the centre to the states, made the states perennially dependant on the centre for aid and financial resources, this attitude has resulted in the states turning a blind eye to strengthening their own sources of revenue and increasing their tax efforts. 
  2. Election freebies and unnecessary subsidies: This revenue stream from the centre to the states has enabled the states to be more extravagant in their expenditure, this tendency can be seen in the distribution election freebies (like TVs, Laptops), unnecessary subsidies and farm loan waivers. 
  3. Decreased tax efforts: The states are happy with the steady flow of revenue from the centre to the state through the FC recommendations, hence they are not improving their tax efforts to increase revenue collection. The citizens are not burned by taxation hence they tend to be happy with the government in power. Yet, another populistic measure. 

The 73rd amendment has replicated this system of devolution to the states and local self governments as well by setting up the State Finance Commission (SFC). The SFC is given the responsibility of giving recommendations regarding transfer of resources from the state to the local self governments. This stream of revenue is being misused the same way the states have misused the money devolved from the centre. In simple words, the problem of Aid curse, Election freebies and decreased tax efforts is being witnessed in utilisation of funds among the local self governments as well.


Note: There has been a trend of previous year Public administration questions related to Indian Administration appearing in the GS paper II of mains exam. The question can be asked in polity governance paper as well. 

Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription

Thursday, July 30, 2020

(PYQ Mock Answer: Polity governance/Public administration) Overburdened District collector

Q. “Reducing the size of the district will provide relief to the overburdened & overworked Collector”. Comment. (2013) 

Answer:

Since the introduction of the office of the District Collector by Warren Hastings, the district collector has played a central role in district administration and till date remains the kingpin of the administration at District level. The notion of reducing the size of the district would provide some relief to the over worked and over burdened district collector, as smaller district size means less people and less area under the district collectors jurisdiction. But however, this solution might not provide a great relief as the collector is overburdened because of the plethora of functions he/she is expected to perform. 
The functions of District collector involves (to name a few): Law and administration, smooth conduct of elections right from parliamentary to local self government elections, enumeration of census, taking care of the needs of the visiting VIPs as the protocol officers, monitoring implementation of welfare and development schemes of the centre and the state, ensuring coordination between various departments of the district administration etc. 
Solution/Way forward:
Solely reducing the size of the district will seldom reduce the workload of the collector. To reduce the work load, the functions performed by the district collector must be reduced. One way is to divest the office of the district collector into two offices, one office can take care of the regulatory functions performed by the collector while the other office can take care of the development related functions of the district collector.



Note: There has been a trend of previous year Public administration questions related to Indian Administration appearing in the GS paper II of mains exam. The question can be asked in polity governance paper as well. 

Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription

Tuesday, July 28, 2020

(Mock Essay UPSC Mains) Indian Civil Services: A steel frame or A steel Cage?

In the era of globalisation, the role of the state has become multi-dimensional as the needs and aspirations of the people are increasing with every passing day. To deliver the services effectively and efficiently the government has started to rely more and more upon the Indian civil services. 

The Indian civil services since the British era has been the steel frame of the administration. Attracting the best of the talents through an all India level merit based examination, the civil servants were imparted with specialised knowledge and training to ensure quality and uniform administration throughout the country. It is the steel frame because the foundation of the building called as Government hangs upon it , like a body on a skeleton. Ensuring uniform administration across the country, form Kashmir to Kanniyakumari, and from Gujrat to Arunachal Pradesh, the steel frame has ensured the unity and integrity of a country full of diversities. 

However, the systemic and systematic rigidities in this steel frame has seldom given scope for expression of creativity and innovation. Bound by strict rules and regulations, hierarchy etc the Indian civil services has become a steel cage that deprives the freedom of the civil servants at one hand and the freedom of the citizens at the other. 

The British had laid the foundation of the civil services with the sole motive of performing regulatory functions- Law and order maintenance and Revenue generation. The ulterior motive was to carry on the British rule in India for as long as possible, if not, forever. This philosophy of the British was ensured by keeping the Indians at the periphery of administration by setting up rules and regulations, code of conduct etc. the Indian civil servants were bound in a steel cage.

The training imparted to the civil servants tried to make civil servants Indian only in appearance but British in all the other characteristics. The civil servants were provided with the best of the training  facilities and through initiation and by interaction the colonial attitude was slowly inculcated in the trainees. This colonial attitude made the civil servants consider themselves as masters and made them become aloof and disconnected from the people. This disconnect ensured that the Indian civil servants don’t extend support to the nationalist expression of the people. This colonial attitude is still clings on to the bureaucracy like a shell on a snails back. 

The steel cage of colonial attitude kept the Indian civil servants aloof from the common public injecting in them a sense of elitism. This attitude ensured that there was high levels of secrecy in the functioning of the bureaucracy and the citizens were kept at the periphery of government. This colonial attitude made sure that the people are treated as subjects to be governed and not as citizens to be empowered. This attitude today makes the Indian civil services treat the common public as outside beneficiaries of governance rather than as equal partners in the process. 

The steel frame set up by the British was an instrument that could be relied upon by the colonial masters. With the Indian civil services in place the control over India was firmly established, as it became an effective instrument through which exploitation of the country can be carried out. This steel frame had allowed for the continuation of the British rule despite the non-cooperation of the Indians in general. 

In the 1940’s one of the prime reasons that had prompted the British to grant freedom to Indians was the fact that the army and the bureaucracy, that formed the steel frame of empire could no longer be relied upon. If the cooperation of the Indian civil servants allowed for the continuation of the British rule in India, then their non cooperation made sure the discontinuation of the same rule. 

Following Independence, Sardar Vallabai Patel made a strong case for retaining the Indian civil services intact as felt it was required for the stability and continuity of India. He equivocally argued for the steel frame was require for the foundation of a new, strong and democratic independent India. Taking into account the high calibre and expertise of the civil servants the Indian civil services apart from the usual regulatory functions was entrusted with the functions of developmental administration as well. This new role envisaged for the civil services was in sync with the democratic governments goal for welfare maximisation of the citizens. 

The developmental administration function of the Indian Civil services was a complete failure which was evident from the failure to successfully implement reforms like the land reforms. The civil servants bound by the steel cage of rules and regulations, hierarchy etc had given more important to implementing rules and regulations rather that to welfare maximisation. The rules and regulations were a means to achieve desired ends but the bureaucracy, due to its obsession with rules and regulations has made implementation of rules and regulations as an end in itself, resulting in goal displacement. 

The other steel cage of the Bureaucracy - Colonial attitude separated the citizens and the bureaucracy. This steel cage separated the two sections so much that the policies and the programs implemented by the bureaucracy was completely different from the needs of the people at the ground level.  This steel cage till date keeps the Citizens at the periphery of the government. 

The existence of this steel cage is evident from the high levels of secrecy in government, lack of accountably mechanisms. Absence of grievance redressal mechanisms, lack of public participation and high levels of discretionary powers in the hands of the officials. 

The steel cage due to the existence of hierarchy has resulted in red Tapism, causing time and cost overruns, economically affecting the growth of the country. For example, Pollaaram dam was envisaged long time ago, the bureaucratic hurdles had resulted in such amounts of cost over runs that that the cost of the project was five times the original cost by the time the construction work started. 

This steel cage that bids the Indian Civil services has resulted in status-quoism, where the civil servants has started to resist any kind of reform. For example, In 1991, new economic policy was announced, the Indian Civil servants were entrusted with the responsibility to attract foreign direct investments (FDI) into the country. The Bureaucracy bound by the steel cage of rules and regulations failed to provide a conducive environment in this regard. This is evident from the continued dismal ranking of our country in the Ease of Doing Business report by World Bank.

There has been a lot of inertia Among the civil servants to adapt themselves to new citizen centric administrative reforms like Right to Information act, Citizens charter, Social Audit etc. The steel cage of the Indian civil services blinds the bureaucracy to realise the importance of citizen empowerment in the fast changing world. 

Even the 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC), had commented that the 21st century India is being governed by 19th century laws. Laws like official secrets act 1923, Indian evidence act 1872, Indian Police act 1861 to name a few are telling of the anachronism that our country suffered from. This has been a major hurdle in dismantling the steel cage of Indian civil services. 

The recent move of the government (2017) to repeal around 1800 old statutes and the intention expressed to repeal another 1200 is a positive step in freeing the bureaucracy from their steel cage, 

The rights based approach of the government with an intention to empower citizens, though initially resisted, is not being acknowledged by the bureaucracy. The move towards e-governance, RTI, citizens charge, social audit etc has enhanced the transparency and the accountability of the Indian Civil services. With an increase in the participation of the civil society organisations in the process of governance, the steel cage that had been a major impediment to civil service activism is being dismantled. 

The increased role of private sector and the reduced role of the public sector enterprises is yet another factor contributing to the withering of the steel cage of the bureaucracy and a release to the stranglehold of bureaucracy on the economic mobility of the country. 

Given the changes that had taken place since the introduction of the Indian civil services till the 21st century, the steel frame of the Indian Civil services has he’d the country intact and facilitated development in multiple spheres. With increasing role of private sector, NGOs, and people themselves, the steel cage of the Indian civil services is being steadily dismantled. The increased focus on sensitivity training has further hastened this process . 

Come what may, the Indian civil services has always been and will always be the steel frame upon which the entire structure of Indian government firmly stands. It is true that the steel cage aspects is still visible but like a beautiful butterfly that emerges from a cocoon, the ongoing civil services reforms will enable the Indian civil services to shed its iron cage. The role of civil services is changing everyday, but its importance is everlasting!      

Future and Ongoing Courses by Siva Prasad -

 https://upscwithsiva.blogspot.com/2020/10/future-and-ongoing-courses-by-siva.html


Use code - "akmsiva", to get 10% discount on Unacademy Plus Subscription